There are many more how-to videos containing useful information on the video page on wik.inormous.net.
Wik.inormous introduction video
February 21st, 2009multimedia extension for mediawiki
January 12th, 2009vPIP (videos Playing In Place) dynamically embeds a video after the viewer clicks on it’s link. Formats supported;
.mov (video) .mp4 (video) .mp3 (audio) .smi or .smil (dynamic video) .3gp (video & audio) .avi (video) .wmv (video) .asf (video) .wma (audio) .swf (video application) .flv (video) .ogg (video) .ogv (video) .oga (audio)
www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:EmbeddedVideo
www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:VPIPPlugin
www.vpip.org/
click below image to see wik.inormous test page with it all running.
added noise
what´s visual wikipedia?
January 6th, 2009Is it technically too difficult to contribute to Wikipedia?
December 8th, 2008Wired has an article about the discussion whether MediaWiki, the platform of Wikipedia, is too difficult for many potential contributors.
The discussion is also relevant for wik.inormous.net, which is hosted on a MediaWiki installation.
Keeping track of the inormous universe/ sphere
December 5th, 2008The inormous universe is expanding.
Bulletin board inormous is a website which keeps track of what’s happening in the inormous universe/ sphere.
The site is a Netvibes site.
New blog in the Inormous sphere
December 5th, 2008The inormous universe has expanded with a second blog: relay.inormous. The present blog is focused on technical and hands-on issues, while relay is more open ended.
Take a look!
Nokia N79 – Most “web 2.0″ for a moderate price?
November 30th, 2008My reliable old Sony Ericsson K750 is long overdue for retirement and I have been looking for a new phone about the same size as the K750 which can be used as a web-2.0-device. Thus, ideally it has to be small; have a good camera for photo and video (at least 3.2 mpxl); include GPS and connect to the web with WiFi. Finally, it has to be reasonably affordable.
These are quite high demands for the mobile’s specs.
The iPhone is dropped due to its size, price and camera.
Sony Ericsson’s C 702 and C 902 are great phones, but lack either wifi or GPS. C 905 is a high-end camera mobile, which fulfills the requirements. It is however a bit too pricey.
Nokia have several interesting mobiles. 6220 lacks however Wifi. Nokia N95, N96 and N85 are high-end multimedia mobiles, which are too advanced for my primary needs. They are (like C 905) also slightly too big and expensive.
Finally, two phones remain: Nokia N82 and N79. The former is an high-end mobile from last year, while N79 is a brand new phone which is priced as between the high- and middle-range of mobiles.
The Nokia N79 matches the technological requirements and is surprisingly small (although larger than the K750) considering all the technology which is crammed into the phone.
Stephen Litchfield (All About Symbian) has a great review of the phone.
The picture is an official image as I could not find a better image on Flickr with the WordPress image search plugin Photodropper.
/Kristian
Playin’ with cumulus
November 29th, 2008Putting the WP cumulus (tag cloud plugin) as an easy manually configurable little (standalone) swf, anywhere in a html page, like inormous.net occasionally do?
Roy Tanck who created Cumulus, tells howto …
Searching with YouTube
November 27th, 2008Alex Iskold at ReadWriteWeb has an interesting blogpost about how children tend to prefer YouTube over Google when searching for information.
It is a great read and as usual some of the comments provide additional food for thought.
One such comment is by “Ray”
YT was always about creating another contextual semantic layer that anyone (society) could benefit from and create super-charged value. the video version of wiki — is one way to think about it.
All google had to do was wait (for the backfill).
So YouTubing for Boggle, I found a short video how to use a short program to find out all words in a boggle batch.
Categories and tags in MediaWiki: Part 1
November 24th, 2008Wik.inormous.net is still in its early stages, but it is obvious that the project could benefit from having both categories and tags like WordPress. It seems to be difficult to create a similar system with MediaWiki. Current issues of creating a viable tag-system will be presented in part 2 of Categories and tags in MediaWIki.
In this part I will try to describe how categories and tags can be combined in a project like wikinormous. A useful way of separating categories from tags is to treat categories as boxes or containers and tags as labels. The difference could be exemplified with how unused items are classified and described in the garage of a well organised family. Things are sorted according to similarities into various boxes. The boxes contain tools, old clothes, toys etc.
There is a large variety among the things which have been put into the “box of toys”. The objects in the box can therefore be ordered into sub-categories as e.g. electronic toys, balls, dolls, lego etc.
Most toys have–in addition to their belonging to various categories of toys–also individual characteristics which can be described differently than according to the rules of classifications. A ball within the category of balls can be described or labelled as being small; brown with coloured spots; old; “It belonged to grandma” or “It’s my favourite ball”. These descriptions are separated from the other toys in the box and some of the descriptions are highly subjective.
Then, hypothetically, the owner of the brown ball with the colourful spots moves with his belongings from the house to a new home in which there are no children and far less toys. If the ball is once again thrown into the garage with other unused things, it can be differently classified since there is no need for a dedicated box for toys. This time the ball is put into the box of gifts. The ball is a classified into a new category due to the different character of the sum of items in the new garage compared with the stuff in the old house.
The tags or labels of the ball, however, remain the same as small; brown with coloured spots; old; “It belonged to grandma” etc.
It seems that the category which an item belongs to is dependent on the character of the other items in the “collection”. Tags are centred around a specific item.
In part two we move on to the problem of classifying and tagging pages in wik.inormous.net and in MediaWiki in general.
Addition:
There is certainly a difference between creating a taxonomy based on the objects which are to be classified or by using a ready-made classification, according tp which the objects in the “garage” are organised. However, the difference between tags and classificatons remains.
/ Kristian




